Anbazhagy @ Mary (41) v. Poongavanam Padayachi (62)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. No. 288 of 2001 Anbazhagy@Mary ..Appellant Vs.

Poongavanam Padayachi ..Respondent Prayer:- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2000 passed by the Sub ordinate Judge of Ariyalur in A.S.No.113 of 1994 setting aside and reversing the Decree and Judgement, dated 1003-1994 passed by the Additional District Munsif of Ariyalur in O.S.No.814 of 92.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr. P.Dinesh Kumar for Sarvabhauman Associates *****

J U D G M E N T

This Second Appeal was listed on 04.10.2017 and though the counsel for the respondent was present, there was no representation for the appellant and the Registry was directed to list the matter today under the caption "for dismissal".

2. Today, the counsel for the respondent is present. However, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent. Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sli https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Sub ordinate Judge, Ariyalur

2. The Additional District Munsif, Ariyalur +1 cc to M/s.Sarvabhuaman Associates sr 71488 S.A. No. 288 of 2001 gmI(co) aa14/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/