R.Ranjith v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 08.01.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.20826 of 2020

1. R.Ranjith

2. A.Saravanan ... Petitioners Vs.

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Puduchatram Police Station, Cuddalore.

(Crime No.611 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the case in Crime No.611 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Puduchatram Police Station, Cuddalore.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.S.Kanmani For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of IPC read with 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation Act, 1957 in Crime No.611 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners have transported 2 units of gravel sand illegally by using their vehicle, without any valid licence. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. On instructions, he would further submit that the petitioners are prepared to deposit some considerable amount to any charitable organization or association without prejudice to their contention and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of gravel sand involved are 2 units. He further submitted that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioners.

5. It is seen that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioners and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each as non-refundable deposit to 'The Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Indian Bank High Court Branch, A/C.No.484026006, IFSC Code. No. IDIB000M157 without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court.

6. Merely because the petitioners have deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of their guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

7. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

(a) The petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(each) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of ' 'The Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Indian Bank High Court Branch', A/C.No.484026006, IFSC Code. No. IDIB000M157, within fifteen

(15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioners is directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or their appearance and on production of proof of deposit of the above amount and on further condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed automatically and on further condition that the petitioners shall also give an letter of undertaking before the respondent/police that the said amount has been paid in respect of particular crime number. [b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation. [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 08/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARANGIPETTAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUCHATRAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE.

5 THE TAMIL NADU ADVOCATE CLERK ASSOCIATION, INDIAN BANK HIGH COURT BRANCH, A/C.NO.484026006, IFSC CODE. NO. IDIB000M157 +2CC to M/S T.S.KANMANI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.334 CRL OP.20826/2020 Date :08/01/2021 MK:19/01/2021