S.Venkatramanan v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH S.Venkatramanan S/o.Srinivasan ... Petitioner vs.
1.The Inspector of Police (Crime), E-3 Teynampet Police Station, Teynampet, Chennai.
2.K.Vijaya W/o.Late G.Kesavamurthi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records in Crime No.886 of 2018 dated 29.06.2018 on the file of the first respondent herein and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thirumaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor [R1] Mr.E.Ashok Kumar [R2] ***** 1/4
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.886 of 2018 pending on the file of first respondent.
2. The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3. A Joint Compromise Memo dated 01.07.2023 signed by both parties and their respective counsel have been filed before this Court and consent affidavit of second respondent/de-facto complainant has been filed before this Court. The petitioner and second respondent were also present in person before this Court. In the consent affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner and the second respondent have entered into a compromise and amicably settled their issues in Crime No.886 of 2018 pending on the file of first respondent. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the case pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in 2/4
nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath) and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the FIR in Crime No.886 of 2018 pending on the file of first respondent.
This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.886 of 2018 pending on the file of first respondent is quashed in entirety and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo dated 01.07.2023 and terms of consent affidavit shall form part and parcel of this order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.1,500/- (Rupees One Thousand and Five Hundred only) as costs, to the credit of the President, Advocates Clerk Association, Ponneri, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District, (The Kancheepuram Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ponneri Branch, A/c No.717907005 IFSC Code:TNSC0010200), within a period of two (2) weeks from today and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
3/4
N. ANAND VENKATESH., J gm Post this case under the caption 'for reporting payment of cost' on 28.08.2023.
09.08.2023 Note : Issue order copy on 14.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm To 1.The Inspector of Police (Crime), E-3 Teynampet Police Station, Teynampet, Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.
4/4