G.Sudarsan v. Mrs.V.R.Sumathi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA A.No.5181 of 2019 in T.O.S.No.32 of 2001 (O.P.No.761 of 2000) In the matter of Indian Succession Act,XXXIX of 1925, and In the matter of the Last Will of testatrix Mrs.G.Varalakshmi died on 18.05.1998 T.O.S.No.32 of 2001:

MRS.V.R.SUMATHI NO.32-A AKBAR SAHIB STREET, TRIPLICANE, CHENNAI-5.

..Plaintiff -VSG.SUDARSAN NO.69,GOVINDAPPA NAICKEN STREET, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI-1.

..Defnedant A.No.5181 OF 2019:

G.SUDARSAN NO.69,GOVINDAPPA NAICKEN STREET, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI-1.

..Applicant/Defnedant -VSMRS.V.R.SUMATHI NO.32-A AKBAR SAHIB STREET, TRIPLICANE, CHENNAI-5.

..Respondent/Plaintiff This application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 2105 days caused in filing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the applicant''s Written Statement in T.O.S.No.32 of 2001 and to receive the same on file.

This application coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order: This application is filed to condone the delay of 2105 days caused in filing the applicant's written statement in T.O.S.No.32 of 2001 and to receive the same on file.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff has got no serious objection for condoning the delay.

4. Upon hearing the submission made by the learned counsel on both sides and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the delay stands condoned and the application is allowed.

Sd/.P.S.N.J.

20.08.2019 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2019.

S.U./20.09.2019 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/