Santhip, M/A 23 Years, v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16145 of 2018 SANTHIP [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SETHIYATHOPE POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

CR.NO.99 OF 2018.

For Petitioner : M/S.B.MOHANRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.IYYAPPARAJ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.99 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with other accused is alleged to have stolen the two wheeler of the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any such offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in one previous case of similar nature. 5.

Taking into consideration the nature of allegations against the petitioner and the submission of the Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner is involved in one previous case,

this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and this petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 25/06/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SETHIYATHOPE POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.B.MOHANRAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.16145/2018 Date :25/06/2018 MLT-03/07/2018