← Library
Madras High CourtWP/35034/2013disposed of

Cable Tv Operators Social v. The Chairman

2018-02-02Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM WP.No.35034 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 Cable TV Operators Social Welfare Association, Rep. by its President Mr.K.Sellapandiyan

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Chairman, 11/22, Mangadu Sami St., Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.

2. The Managing Director, 11/22, Mangadu Sami St., Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.

3. The Special Tahsildar / Deputy Manager, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to give signals to the members of the petitioner association from the Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited Digital Control Room, Vellore. For Petitioner : M/s.E.P.Senniyangiri For Respondents : Mr.Abdul Saleem

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to give signals to the members of the petitioner Association from the Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited Digital Control Room, Vellore.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representations of the petitioner-Association were not considered by the respondents. Hence, the present writ petition.

4. It is further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider the representations of of the petitioner.

5. The learned standing counsel for the respondents submitted that there is no proof for receipt of the representation from the petitioner and if a fresh representation is given, the same will be considered in accordance with law.

6. In the light of the above submissions, this Court without going into the merits, directs the petitioner to give fresh representation to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such compliance, the second respondent shall consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law after providing opportunity to the necessary parties within eight weeks therefrom.

7. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To

1. The Chairman, 11/22, Mangadu Sami St., Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.

2. The Managing Director, 11/22, Mangadu Sami St., Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.

3. The Special Tahsildar / Deputy Manager, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

+1cc to Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri, Advocate, S.R.No.8152 +1cc to Mr.Abdul Saleem, Advocate, S.R.No.8265 +1cc to Govt.Pleader S.R.No.9021 WP.No.35034 of 2013 RRK(26/02/2018)