Pavunambal v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

1. Pavunambal

2. Sanjaydevan

3. Velan

4. Murugan

5. Ramesh

6. Arumugam ..Petitioners Vs The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Ulundurpet Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

Crime No.610/2025 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to grant Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioners in the event of their arrest in Crime No.610/2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners:

Mr.R. Surya Prakash For Respondent:

Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections

191(2), 329(4) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 @ 191(2), 329(4), 316(2), 318(2) and 351(3) /Under section 147, 448 and 506 @ 147, 448, 406, 417 and 507 of IPC in Crime No.610 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, broke the house door lock, damaged the property and occupied it, and threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it is a case of civil dispute between the petitioners and the de facto complainant. He further submitted that A1 has already been released on bail. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that no one has injured in the occurrence. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, considering the fact that A1 has already been released on bail, and the entire issue is in respect of immovable property, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required at this stage. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form

No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

17-06-2026 SHL To:

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet

2. The Inspector of Police, Ulundurpet Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

SHL 17-06-2026