Mohamed Irfan v. The State Rep By Its
P.DHANABAL,J.
Today, the matter was listed under the caption for ''Reporting compliance''.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was already granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court by order dated 25.07.2024, on condition that the the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the credit of Crime No.513 of 2024 on or before 09.09.2024. As per the directions of this Court, the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the credit of Crime No.513 of 2024 and he also produced a proof for the same. Hence, he seeks for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that the investigation has been completed.
4. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and that investigation was completed and the condition imposed by 1/4
this Court is also duly complied by the petitioner, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner dated 25.07.2024 is made absolute on the following conditions:
5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy was made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Perambalur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions that:
[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every day for a period of 30 days and thereafter, as and when required for the interrogation;
[b] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the 2/4
learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
01.10.2024 vkr 3/4
P.DHANABAL,J.
vkr 01.10.2024 4/4