Rajangam, Aged 48 Years v. The District Collector And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.03.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH H.C.P.No.1961 of 2016 Rajangam ..

Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector and District Magistrate of Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

..

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records relating to the detention order dated 14.03.2016 passed by the first respondent herein in office ref.Cr.M.P.No.04/2016 quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's brother Senthilkumar, son of Rengaraj Achari, aged 38, Golden Nagar, Thirumandurai Vilalge, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District, presently undergoing detention in the Central Prison, Trichy under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed, by the friend of the detenu, namely, Senthilkumar, to issue a Writ of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Habeas Corpus, to call for the records connected with the detention order of the first respondent, in Cr.M.P.No.04/2016 dated 14.03.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's friend, by name Senthilkumar, son of Rengaraj Achari, aged about 38 years, detained in Central Prison, Tirchy, before this Court and set him at liberty.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the order of detention passed by the first respondent as against the friend of the petitioner is dated 14.03.2016 and thus, as on today this petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To

1. The District Collector and District Magistrate of Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2. The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

3.The Superintendnet, Central Prison, Trichy. 4.The Joint Secretary to Govt., Public (L&O) Fort St.George,Chennai.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

pa(co) krd 7/4 H.C.P.No.1961 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/