Rajaraman @ Raja v. State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Rajaraman @ Raja ... Petitioner Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

(Crime No.155 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.155 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Valarmathi For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) & 20(b)(ii)(A) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No.155 of Page No.1 of 6

2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that based on secret information, the respondent Police on 05.05.2025 at about 22.00 hours had gone to Devikapuram Petrol Bunk and made vehicle check up, at the time, the petitioner along with other two accused were found in possession of 48 grams of ganja. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that based on secret information, the respondent Police on 05.05.2025 at about 22.00 hours had gone to Devikapuram Petrol Bunk and made vehicle check up, at the time, the petitioner along with other two accused were found in possession of 48 grams of ganja. He further submits that the co-accused (A1 & A2) were granted bail by the lower Court and the petitioner has no previous case.

Page No.2 of 6

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and co-accused A1 and A2 were granted bail by the lower Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b]The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identify proofs to ensure their identity; Page No.3 of 6

[c]the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police officer as and when required;

[f] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for Police custody beyond the first fifteen days, they shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard;

[g] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [h] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

27.06.2025 vv2 To Page No.4 of 6

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Polur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

Page No.5 of 6

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

vv2 27.06.2025 Page No.6 of 6