Tmt.Vasantha Ganesan, v. M/S.Sterling Tree Magnum India Ltd, Rep.By The Official Liquidator,

Comp.A.No.292 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 Comp.A.No.292 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 M.SUNDAR, J., Captioned application has been filed seeking 'Condonation of Delay' ['COD'].

2. COD prayer is qua delay in filing claim petition in Form No.66.

3. Mr.G.K.Thamizh Arasan, learned counsel on record for applicant adverting to support affidavit submits that since the applicant's husband passed away and applicant also fell sick, she was able to submit Form No.66 on 04.08.2022 but the respondent sent a reply stating that Form No.66 has to be submitted after obtaining orders from this Court condoning the delay.

4. Mr.Pamarthi Sridhar, learned 'Official Liquidator attached to this Court' [hereinafter 'OL' for the sake of convenience and clarity] submits that he has no serious objection or opposition to COD prayer in captioned application.

Page No:1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Comp.A.No.292 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 M.SUNDAR, J., mk

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, COD prayer is acceded to i.e., captioned application is ordered as prayed for and delay is condoned albeit subject to condition that the applicant should file Form No.66 before OL along with original support papers on or before 09.09.2022 failing which the captioned application will stand dismissed without reference to this Court.

6. Captioned application ordered on the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

26.08.2022 mk Comp.A.No.292 of 2022 in C.P.No.73 of 2000 Page No:2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis