Madras High CourtWP/21746/2023disposed of

M.Mahendiran v. State Of Tamil Nadu

2023-07-21Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.07.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.21746 of 2023

1. M.Mahendiran

2. S.Karunanidhi

3. M.Madehwaran

4. G.Muniraj

5. S.Venkatraman

6. Thirupathi

7. L.Rajan

8. R.Pandiyan

9. M.Venkatesan

10. T.Ramamoorthy

11. L.Palani

12. T.Marikannu

13. C.Amudha

14. P.Renuga ... Petitioners Vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary, Namakal Kavingar Maligai, St. George Fort, Chennai.

1/6

2. The Commissioner, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Elilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

3. The Director, Elilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

4. The Project Officer [Tribal Welfare], District Tribal Welfare Office, Dharmapuri.

5. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, District Collector's Office, Dharmapuri District.

6. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Dharmapuri Division, Dharmapuri Taluk Office, Dharmapuri District.

7. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Pappireddipatti Taluk - Harur Division, Pappireddipatti Taluk Office, Dharmapuri District.

8. The Special Tahsildar, Adi dravidar Welfare, Harur division, Harur Taluk Office, Dharmapuri District.

... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to regularize the posts of the petitioners from the date of their Appointment 2/6

by enforcing his proceedings Na.Ka.12846/2011/L2 dated Nil .11.2017 and release the appointment in the years of 2006 and 2007. For petitioners : Mr.D.Senthilkumar For respondents : Mr.V.P.R.Elamparithi Additional Public prosecutor

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the fourth respondent to regularize the posts of the petitioners from the date of their appointment by enforcing his proceedings Na.Ka.12846/2011/L2 dated Nil .11.2017 and release the appointment in the year of 2006 and 2007.

2. Though various grounds have been raised in the affidavit filed along with the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that it is suffice that their representations are considered on merits.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that they will consider the representation 3/6

of the petitioners and pass Orders on the same within a period of two months.

4. In such view of the matter, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass Orders on its own merits within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

21.07.2023 Index:Yes/No vrc To,

1. The Additional Chief Secretary, Namakal Kavingar Maligai, St. George Fort, Chennai.

4/6