M S Mahaveer Finance India Limited v. Harish S

Arb.Appln.No.788 of 2025 M/s.Mahaveer Finance India Limited ... Applicant vs.

1.Harish S 2.Mallikarjuna ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr.M.Arunachalam ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Till date, the Advocate Commissioner has not re-possessed the vehicle. Sufficient time has also been granted to the Advocated Commissioner to execute the Warrant of Commission. No useful purpose would be served, if this application is allowed to be kept pending.

2. Hence, this application is closed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner as and when the vehicle is located. While considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same advocate commissioner, who has been appointed in this application, since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the advocate commissioner. 28.08.2025 sp Page No.1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ABDUL QUDDHOSE.

J.

sp Arb.Appln.No.788 of 2025 28.08.2025 Page No.2 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis