Madras High CourtWP/35138/2013disposed of

T.S. Prabhavathi B.A., B.L., v. The Secretary To

2016-06-22Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.06.2016

CORAM

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.35138 of 2013 T.S.Prabhavathi .. Petitioner -vs1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001.

2.The Secretary to Government of India, Commission for Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes, Ministry of Welfare, Floor V Loknayak Bhawan, New Delhi-110 003.

3.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

4.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Chennai-600 009.

5.The Secretary, Revenue Department, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

6.The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

.. Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing all the respondents to take appropriate action on the representation dated 18.12.2013 within their jurisdiction.

For Petitioner: Mr.A.Ramesh Manikandan For Respondents: Ms.Sunitha Kumari CGSC for R1 & R2 Mr.STS.Moorthy Govt. Pleader assisted by Mr.V.Shanmugasundar Govt. Advocate for R3 to R6

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The issue is important - land allotted to the SC/ST community being transferred to the other parties, who may not be eligible. However, the petitioner has come with no facts to the Court and though we have issued directions from time to time where such illegalities are found, the petitioner must have responsibility in doing the ground work when she approaches the Court seeking redressal of the grievance. Where such transfers took place, she should have been pointed out, so that the Court could have issued directions to the respondents for necessary enquiry. But even this basic factual disclosure is not present and there is no purpose of academic and general directions.

2. The writ petition, accordingly, stands closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

To 1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001.