Madras High CourtCRL OP/19538/2021dismissed

Gowtham v. State Rep By

2021-10-21Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19538 of 2021 GOWTHAM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION, RANIPET DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 270/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. D.K.NEPOLEAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 307 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.270 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a quarrel between the petitioner and the defaco complainant. Due to which they attacked each other. Thereby the defacto complainant sustained severe injuries. Hence the Law Enforcing Agency registered a case against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner is an history sheeter and there are five previous cases similar in nature pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the allegation level against the petitioner and also considering that there are five previous cases similar in nature pending against petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 21/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION, RANIPET DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S. D.K.NEPOLEAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.11514 CRL OP.19538/2021 Date :21/10/2021 APN 29/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/