Boopathy v. State Rep. By.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Boopathy : Petitioner Vs.

1.State rep. By The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 004 2.The District Registrar, Tiruppur District 82, Raj Complex, P.N.Road, Tiruppur 3.The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet, Kutchery Street, Taluk Office Campus Near Police Station, Udumalpettai (Post) : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 31/05/2025 for fixation to guideline value with respect to the subject property situate at Plot No.27, MVS Nagar Phase I, S.F.No.261/2 and 261/A2, Somvarapatti Village, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District 1/4

measuring about 3.71 cents within a stipulated period as fixed by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.Prangkelin S.

For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer as sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 11.08.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order mrn To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, 2/4

Chennai 600 004 2.The District Registrar, Tiruppur District 82, Raj Complex, P.N.Road, Tiruppur 3.The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet, Kutchery Street, Taluk Office Campus Near Police Station, Udumalpettai (Post) 3/4

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

(mrn) 11.08.2025 4/4