Jayanthi v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.02.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Crl.O.P.No.1687 of 2018 Jayanthi ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by 1.The Inspector of Police, Oomangalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent police to investigate the Crime No.39 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent and to file a final report.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Lawrance Prabu For Respondents :

Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the first respondent police to investigate the case in Crime No.39 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent and to file a final report.

2. The investigation in Crime No. 39 of 2016 has already been stayed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.19991 of 2016. Hence, it would not be appropriate to consider the prayer sought for in the present Criminal Original Petition. The petitioner herein has also been arrayed as second respondent in the said Criminal Original Petition. The petitioner can always ventilate his grievance, before this Court in Crl.O.P.No.19991 of 2016 and as such, the present petition to file final report is not maintainable.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. With the above observation, the Criminal Original petition stands dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nl To 1.The Inspector of Police, Oomangalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to Mr. T. Lawrance Prabu, Advocate Sr.8240 Crl.O.P.No.1687 of 2018 (AR-J) EU(17/02/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/