V.Amaravathi v. The State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N. MANJULA W.P.No.22293 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.23520 and 23521 of 2021 V.Amaravathi Petitioner vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Revenue Department Chennai - 600 009

2. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District

3. The Tahsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk

4. The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Page Nos.1/6

5. Assistant Divisional Engineer (Highways) ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the fifth respondent impugned order in Memo No.307/2021/Vo dated 24.09.2021 and quash the same, consequently forbearing the respondents from evicting the petitioner except under due process of law.

For petitioner :

Mr. J.Saravana Vel For Respondents :

Mr.T.K.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M. SUNDAR, J.) Mr. J. Saravana Vel, learned counsel on record for sole writ petitioner and Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for all the respondents are before this Court.

2. Mr.J.Saravana Vel, learned counsel for sole writ petitioner reports 'No instructions'. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: Page Nos.2/6

3. To be noted, learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that he has sent a communication through Registered Post with acknowledgement due to the sole writ petitioner, sole writ petitioner has duly received the same but has not chosen to respond or reply. The writ petitioner has not contacted is learned counsel's further say.

Page Nos.3/6

4. This Court makes it clear that we would be giving a closure to the captioned Writ Petition and captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition thereat today but all the rights and contentions of writ petitioner will stand preserved if the writ petitioner chooses to resuscitate the matter later. Resuscitating the matter will obviously be subject to submission of writ petitioner in accordance with law (if permissible). Captioned writ petition and captioned writ miscellaneous petition thereat are closed with the aforementioned observation and preservation of rights in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.) 07.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No gpa Page Nos.4/6

To

1. The Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu Revenue Department Chennai - 600 009

2. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District

3. The Tahsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk

4. The Divisional Engineer (Highways)

5. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Highways) Page Nos.5/6

M. SUNDAR, J.

and R.N. MANJULA, J.

gpa W.P.No.22293 of 2021 07.04.2025 Page Nos.6/6