← Library
Madras High CourtWP/35359/2013disposed of

C.Rajkumar v. The Senior Regional Manager

2018-06-29Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.35359 of 2013 and M.P.No. 1 of 2014 C.Rajkumar ... Petitioner -vs1.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited., LLA Building, No.735, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The District Manager, TASMAC Limited Chennai (South) District, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 058.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

4. The Inspector of Police, (Law & Order) R-1, Mambalam Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

5. M.Gopalakrishnan 16/1, Bharath Nagar, 1st Cross Street, Madipakkam, Chennai - 600 091.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent to take action on the representation dated 25.12.2013 of the petitioner and prevent the 5th respondent from interfering with the petitioner's business operation by granting sufficient police protection for running a bar-cum-eatery at TASMAC Retail Vending Liquor Shop No.521, No.1, South Boag Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

For Petitioner :: Mr.V.Karthikeyan For Respondents :: Mrs.A.Sri Jayanthi Special Government Pleader for R3 and R4.

None appeared for R1,R2 and R5.

O R D E R

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the 3rd respondent to take action on the representation dated 25.12.2013 of the writ petitioner and prevent the 5th respondent from interfering with the petitioner's business operation by granting sufficient police protection for running a bar-cumeatery at TASMAC Retail Vending Liquor Shop No.521, No.1, South Boag Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner now states that the relief as sought for need not be considered in view of long lapse of time. However, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner pleaded that the caution deposit made by the writ petitioner is now lying with the respondents. However, there is no such prayer as sought for in the present writ petition. Thus, the writ petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation for the purpose of redressal of this grievances to the respondent and in any event receiving any such representation, the respondents are at liberty to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders.

3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, there is no order as to costs. msv Sd/- Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Limited., LLA Building, No.735, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The District Manager, TASMAC Limited Chennai (South) District, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 058.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

4. The Inspector of Police, (Law & Order) R-1, Mambalam Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

+ 1 cc to Mr. Government Pleader SR.42455 W.P.No.35359 of 2013 and M.P.No. 1 of 2014 (CS-DR) EU(13/07/2018)