M.Moorthy v. State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.10.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.15192 of 2013 1.M.Moorthy 2.R.Sadaivel 3.P.Ramesh 4.C.Annappan 5.M.Kannaiyan 6.P.Jayaraman 7.M.Kaliyamurthy 8.M.Gunasekaran 9.A.Kumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By Secretary, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai - 108.

3. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Cuddalore Division, Cuddalore.

4. The Executive Offivcer, Tirukoilur Town Panchayat, Tirukoilur, Villupuram District.

.. Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to count the half of the petitioners temporary service as mentioned in the Annexure along with regular service for the purpose of pension and other terminal benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioners : Mr.K.M.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar, for RR1 to 3 For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan, for R4

O R D E R

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar msm To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By Secretary, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai - 108.

3. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Cuddalore Division, Cuddalore.

W.P.No.15192 of 2013 KP(21.11.2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/