Satheesh @ Vanjinthan v. State Rep. By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19499 of 2021 SATHEESH @ VANJINTHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP. BY ITS [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KRISHNAGIRI TALUK POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.411 OF 2021) For Petitioner : M/S.M.P.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.09.2021 for the offence under Sections 399 and 402 of I.P.C. in Cr.No.411 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner is alleged to have been preparing to commit dacoity. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that there are three previous cases as against the petitioner. 5.Considering the fact that there are three previous cases as against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 21/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KRISHNAGIRI TALUK POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.M.P.SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19499/2021 Date :21/10/2021 JPA 26/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/