A. Noorudhen v. The Distrit Revenue Oficer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 02.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN W.P.No.18196 of 2009 A.Noorudheen .. Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

.. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to release the 93 bags of paddy each 79 kg seized by the 2nd respondent on 03.09.2009 seized from the Lorry Bearing Registration No. TN-05-M-2793 to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.S.Thangavadhana Balakrishnan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the paddy seized by the 2nd respondent was released and nothing survives in the writ petition.

2.Based on the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in the writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V ) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

AT To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.53971 W.P.No.18196 of 2009 RGN(CO) GMY(09/11/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/