← Library
Madras High CourtWA/167/2021dismissed as infructuous

The State Of Tamilnadu v. A.Ponnudurai

2024-04-25Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar,Honourable Mr Justice K.Kumaresh Babu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.

2.The Joint Director (Craftsmen Training Scheme) Directorate of Employment and Training, Training Wing, Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Alandur Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. ... Appellants versus 1.A.Ponnudurai 2.The Chairman ... Respondents 1/4

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed against the order in WP No.115 of 2020 dated 28.01.2020 of the learned Single Judge.

For the Appellants :Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader For the Respondents :Mrs.C.Uma for the first respondent second respondent- No appearance

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.) The Writ Appeal is filed against the order in WP No.115 of 2020 dated 28.01.2020 of the learned Single Judge.

2. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants submit that pursuant to the directions issued by the Writ Court in WP No.115 of 2020 dated 28.01.2020, the second applellant has passed an order, intimating to the first respondent/writ petitioner that there is no vacancy available at the time of publishing the waiting list. He further submits that the same has been communicated to the first respondent herein 2/4

and therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that the said communication has been received by the first respondent.

4. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ appeal. Consequently, the writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. If aggrieved by the decision taken by the authority concerned, it is for the first respondent/writ petitioner to work out his remedy, in the manner known to law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, CMP No.798 of 2021 is closed.

[D.K.K., J.] [K.B., J.] 25.04.2024 Index : Yes/No mrn 3/4

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

(mrn) 25.04.2024 4/4