Madras High CourtCRL OP/19742/2021dismissed

K.Saravanan v. The State Rep By

2021-10-25Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19742 of 2021 K.SARAVANAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIMUSHNAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

(CR NO. 420/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Section 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.420 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant brother is working in abroad. A2 is the wife of the defacto complainant's brother. She had illegal intimacy with A1 and the same was ojected by the defacto complainant. Thereafter A1 and A2 joined together and attacked the defacto complainant with Aruval. Due to which the defacto complainant sustained severe injuries. Based on the complaint, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the injured discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, though the injured person discharged from the hospital, the offence committed by the petitioner is serious one. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 25/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIMUSHNAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19742/2021 Date :25/10/2021 CSK 29/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/