← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/17499/2023allowed

Barathi v. State Of Tamilnadu Inspector Of Police

2023-08-09Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Barathi S/o. Elangovan ... Petitioner vs.

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Inspector of Police, Chinnasalem Police Station Kallakuruchi District.

2. Mr.Arunagiri S/o. Velayudham ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.51 of 2023 on the file of first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vijayaragavan For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor [R1] *****

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.51 of 2023 pending on the file of first respondent.

2. The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the 1/4

parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Compromise Memo dated 27.06.2023 signed by both parties has been filed before this Court. A compromise affidavit has been filed by the second respondent/de-facto complainant before this Court. The petitioner and second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr.A.Dhanasekaran, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Chinna Salem [94438 79606]. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner and the second respondent have entered into a compromise and amicably settled their issues in Crime No.51 of 2023 pending on the file of first respondent. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the case pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath) and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported 2/4

in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the FIR in Crime No.51 of 2023 pending on the file of first respondent.

This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.51 of 2023 pending on the file of first respondent is quashed and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo dated 27.06.2023 and the terms of affidavit shall form part and parcel of this order. 07.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm To 1.The Inspector of Police, Chinnasalem Police Station Kallakuruchi District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.

3/4

N. ANAND VENKATESH., J gm 09.08.2023 4/4