Venkatesh v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.19749 of 2021 Venkatesh ... Petitioner Vs.
State: Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
(Crime No.612 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C, prayed to enlarge the bail to the petitioner in Crime No.612 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner who was arrested on 06.09.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Section 8(c), 20(b) (ii) (B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 in Crime No.612 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on getting secret information the respondent police went to the petitioner's home back side, some persons have purchased a small pockets, after watching them, they escaped from there. The respondent/police was found in possession of 2kgs of ganga and recovered the same from the petitioner's home and the petitioner was escaped from the scene of occurrence. Hence the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submits that the seized quantity is not a commercial quantity and there was no previous case against the petitioner. Hence he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that though no previous case against the petitioner and he has escaped from the scene of occurrence.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the seized quantity is not a commercial quantity and there was no previous case against the petitioner and further considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, EC and NDPS Court, Salem and on further conditions that:
(a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 25/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE SPECIAL JUDGE, EC AND NDPS COURT, SALEM.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHOOLAGIRI POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.
3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to MR.M.P.SARAVANAN, Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19749/2021 Date :25/10/2021 JPA 26/10/2021