Tata Capital Ltd v. Balasubramanian K

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. No.427 of 2024 Tata Capital Ltd.

.. Applicant vs Balasubramanian K .. Respondent

ORDER

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle is still to be located and therefore, the Advocate Commissioner is not in a position to re-possess the vehicle.

2.As seen from the earlier proceedings, sufficient time has been granted for locating the vehicle. Therefore, no further extension can be granted. No prejudice would be caused to the applicant if this application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief, once the vehicle is located.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

vga 3.Accordingly, this application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief, once the vehicle is located.

4.While considering the fresh application to be filed by the applicant in the near future, this Court will consider retaining the very same Commissioner appointed by this Court in this application as the applicant has already paid the Advocate Commissioner's initial remuneration of Rs.30,000/-. 18.02.2025 vga Arb.Appln. No.427 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis