Dr M.R.Subramaniam v. S.Sankar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.01.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.S.No.351 of 2004

1. Dr.M.R.Subramaniam

2. Seethamal

3. Dr.M.S.Ramachandran

4. M.S.Venkataraman ... Plaintiffs ..vs..

1. S.Sankar

2. Vidhya Sankar

3. Janani

4. Ramamoorthy

5. M.Karpagam

6. B.Suresh

7. Smt.Rajakantha, Sub Inspector of Police, W-2, All Women Police Station, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.

8. Ms.Mallika, Police Constable, W-2, All Women Police Station, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.

9. Masilimani Police Constable W-2, All Women Police Station, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.

10.The State, Rep. By the Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Madras - 9.

... Respondents

Prayer : This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. read with Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules praying for the following relief: (i) Directing the defendants 1-9 to jointly and severally pay damages of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees thirty lakhs only) to the plaintiffs herein; (ii) Declaring that initiation of Cr.No.44 of 2001 by the first defendant and all proceedings thereunder culminated in C.C.No.3533/2001 on the file of the 18th Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, filed against the plaitniffs herein, is an abuse of legal process; (iii) Declaring that the plaintiffs have never demanded any dowry whether in cash or kind whether directly or indirectly from defendants 1-3 and have not harassed the third defendant for dowry; (iv) Costs of this suit;

(v) Interest thereof.

For Plaintiffs :

No appearance For D1 to D3 :

Mr.R.Srinivas

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for consideration on 05.01.2015, there was no representation for the plaintiffs. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today also, there is no representation for the plaintiffs. Hence, this Civil Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

06.01.2015 ogy

S.VIMALA, J.

ogy C.S.No.351 of 2004 06.01.2015