← Library
Madras High CourtWP/21953/2024disposed of

G.Janakiraman v. The District Collector

2024-07-31Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 31.07.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P. No.21953 of 2024 and W.M.P. No.23934 of 2024 G.Janakiraman ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector 2.The District Revenue Officer 3.The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer Chengalpattu Revenue Division Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District 4.The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk Thiruporur, Chengalpattu district 5.Ms.Jeevitha 6.Mukesh P.Hemdev ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 5 from Page 1/5

transferring patta or mutating the revenue records with regard to property of the petitioner in S. No.67/12C14B, situated at Krishnan Karanai Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpattu District till the disposal of the civil suit in O.S. No.325 of 2022 on the file of Principal Sub-Judge, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathish Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to forebear the respondents 1 to 5 from transferring patta or mutating the revenue records with regard to property of the petitioner in S. No.67/12C14B, situated at Krishnan Karanai Village, Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpattu District till the disposal of the civil suit in O.S. No.325 of 2022 on the file of Principal Sub-Judge, Chengalpattu.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and perused the entire materials available on record.

Page 2/5

3. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that, as the suit between the parties is already pending in O.S. No.325 of 2022 on the file of Principal SubJudge, Chengalpattu, his application for mutation was not considered.

4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that during pendency of the original suit, mutation will not be effected. The said statement is recorded.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.

31.07.2024 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No Asr To 1.The District Collector 2.The District Revenue Officer Page 3/5

3.The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer Chengalpattu Revenue Division Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District 4.The Tahsildar Thiruporur Taluk Thiruporur, Chengalpattu district 5.The Government Pleader High Court, Madras N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

Asr Page 4/5

W.P. No.21953 of 2024 and W.M.P. No.23934 of 2024 31.07.2024 Page 5/5