← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27812/2023disposed of

Ms.Weld Eezy v. The District Collector

2023-09-25Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.09.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU M/s.Weld Eezy Having its registered office New No.11, Old No.8 Parangusapuram Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024 rep. by its Partner Sankaranarayanan.

.. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Singaravelarmaligai, Chennai District.

2.The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Wing, In charge Additional Director General of Police Chennai-83.

3.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing-II, Chennai-83.

4.M.R.Jaganathan .. Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first and second respondents not to vacate the petitioner from the premises bearing T.S.No.4/2 and 4/3, Survey No.1289/1, 1293/1, Endathur Road, Iyyanarappan Koil Street, Madhuranthagam-603 306 except due process of law.

For the Petitioner : Mr.P.G.Perumal Pandian For the Respondents : Mrs.R.Anitha Spl. Government Pleader for respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Addl. Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John for respondent Nos.2 and 3

ORDER

(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.P.G.Perumal Pandian, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader for the first respondent; and, Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.

2. The petitioner claims to be a tenant under respondent No.4. The proceedings are deemed to have been initiated against respondent No.4 for the offences punishable under the India Penal Code. The property is attached pursuant to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944.

3. The procedure is prescribed for an aggrieved party in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944 itself. The petitioner may avail the remedy that may be permissible under law. In that event, all contentions are kept open.

4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed. There will be no order as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 25.09.2023 Index :

Yes/No Yes/No bbr

To:

1.The District Collector, Singaravelarmaligai, Chennai District.

2.The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Wing, In charge Additional Director General of Police Chennai-83.

3.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing-II, Chennai-83.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

bbr 25.09.2023