Boopathi v. State By The Inspector Of Police

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of IPC in Crime No.262 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as a testing auto driver. On 10.08.2022 at about 3.15 p.m., when he was test driving of the auto from Hosur to Krishnagiri and returned to hosur, 4 persons came in a two wheeler and way laid the defacto complainant and taking his ID card and key . It is further alleged that one of the accused person suspected the defacto complainant and asked him if any ganja transported in his auto and he demanded to give Rs.10,000/- and further alleged that they were also transferred about of Rs.9,200/- through google pay from the defacto complainant's mobile phone and went to petrol bunk for filling petrol in their two wheeler and dropped him near toll gate and ran away. Hence, the complaint. 1/3

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded to give Rs.10,000/- and they were transferred about of Rs.9,200/- through Google pay from the defacto complainant's mobile phone. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and also the serious offence committed by the petitioner this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 29.08.2022 vv 2/3

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Vv 29.08.2022 3/3