Murugan v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19901 of 2021 1 MURUGAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 PALANIVEL 3 SELVAKUMAR 4 RAVEENTHIRAN Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION AND ENFORCEMENT WING,(PEW), ARIYALUR, CRIME NO.966 OF 2021 For Petitioners : M/S.N.BALAMURALIKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa) 4 (1)(J)(ii), 4(1-i) & 4(1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act r/w 409 of I.P.C in Cr.No.966 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found in illegal possession of 81 liquor bottles each containing 180 ml and the same was seized by the respondent police. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners, on their own volition, without prejudice to their
rights, are ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- each for the purpose of improving and maintaining the Government/Government aided Schools.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation is pending in this case against the petitioner. 5.Considering facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that they are ready to contribute the amount as may be ordered by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate No-II Court, Jayankondam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand Only) each, with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)if the petitioners failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b)the petitioners shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each to the credit of the Chief Educational Officer, Ariyalur District for the rehabilitation and improvement of the basic needs of the Government/Government aided Schools in the said District under necessary acknowledgement, without prejudice to their defence before the trial Court and submit the proof of payment of the said amount before the aforesaid learned Judicial Magistrate, who after perusing the challan/ receipt/acknowledgement, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioners;
(c)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (d)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;
(e)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(f)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(g)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (h)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
7. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the Chief Educational Officer shall submit the necessary proof with regard to the expenditure incurred for the improvement/rehabilitation of the Schools in the District before the Commissioner of School Education as and when such works are completed by utilizing the money as ordered by this Court.
-sd/- 26/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, NO.II, JAYANKONDAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARIYALUR [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION AND ENFORCEMENT WING, (PEW), ARIYALUR, 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S.N.BALAMURALIKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.11812 CRL OP.19901/2021 Date :26/10/2021 JPA 29/10/2021