Pakkiri v. Venkatesan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. Nos.429 of 2001 Pakkiri .. Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.

1.Venkatesan 2.Dhanalakshmi 3.Jyothi 4.Paranthaman ..Respondents/Defandants Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 27.09.1999 in A.S.No.31/99 and the cross objections before the Principal District Court, Cuddalore, preferred against the judgment and the decree dated 14.12.1998 in O.S.901 of 1994 before the Additional District Munsif's Court, Cuddalore.

For Appellant : Mr.R.Meenal For Respondents : No Appearance for R2

J U D G M E N T

Counsel for the appellant present and filed a memo informing that the sole appellant died and unable to trace the Legal Representatives of the sole appellant and could not take any steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant on record. The said memo is taken on record.

2. In the light of the above, the second appeal is dismissed as abated for not taking any steps to bring the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant. No costs.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

MEMO FILED ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT The letter of the sole appellant returned with the endorsement that he is dead. We are unable to trace his egal representatives. Hence the second appeal may be dismissed as abated with leave to file necessary applications if the legal representatives are traced.

Sd/- Counsel for Appellant Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To

1. The Principal District Judge, Cuddalore

2. The Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras-104 +1cc to Mr.R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.75597 S.A.No.429 of 2001 KGK(CO) CS/07/12/17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/