Madras High CourtWP/3755/2012dismissed as infructuous

S. Viajayalakshmi v. The Commissioner

2017-12-06Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.12.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.3755 of 2012 S.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner vs.

The Commissioner, Tambaram Municipality, Tambaram.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records comprised in Na.Ka.No.1831/2011/F1, dated 07.02.2012 on the file of the respondent, and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent :

Mr.O.Selvam, Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar aeb To:

The Commissioner, Tambaram Municipality, Tambaram.

Order in W.P.No.3755 of 2012 SSD(CO) TR(26/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/