Muruganatham v. Kailasam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.11.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM C.M.A.NPD.(B).No.2900 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.16494 of 2004 1.

Muruganantham 2.

Thilagavathi 3.

Jayalakshmi 4.

Revathi .. Appellants .. Vs ..

1.

Kailasam 2.

Santha .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 (t) of the CPC, against the order and decreetal order of the learned I Additional District Judge, Salem, dated 27.02.2004 passed in I.A.No.1922 of 2003 in A.S.No.167 of 2000.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Steps due - - - - -

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 23.11.2016 under the caption "For Dismissal". Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 24.11.2016 Internet : Yes Jrl To The First Additional District Judge, Salem.

G.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

Jrl C.M.A.NPD.(B).No.2900 of 2004 24.11.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in