← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18322/2025dismissed

Dinesh v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

2025-07-15Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Dinesh ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, W6 All Women Police Station, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600023.

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.10 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For Respondent :

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.05.2025, in connection with Crime No.10 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent police, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 6 and 11(1) r/w 12 and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 , seeks bail.

1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused, aged about 57 years, had committed penetrative sexual assault on the minor victim girl. Hence the case.

3. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that due to personal enmity, a false complaint has been lodged against the petitioner. Hence, he prayed for bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for granting bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that the statement has been recorded from the victim girl under Section 183 BNSS.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the statement given by the minor victim girl, wherein, she had clearly deposed 2/4

about the offence made out by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 15.07.2025 ham To

1. The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, W6 All Women Police Station, Ayanavaram, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

ham 15.07.2025 4/4