Radhakrishnan, Age 52 Years, v. Inspector Of Police,

Crl.O.P.No.23188 of 2016 N.AUTHINATHAN,J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 325 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.1328 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, pray for anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail.

3.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Having regard to the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioners are not reported to have bad antecedents and they are willing to co-operate with the investigating agency, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

N.AUTHINATHAN, J.

ssd 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Alandur and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. 14.10.2016 ssd Crl.O.P.No.23188 of 2016