D.S.Rengarajan v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 24.07.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.25424 of 2007
1. D.S.Rengarajan
2. R.Krishnasamy
3. P.Selvam
4. S.R.Satyavaheeswaran
5. R.Narayanan
6. G.Ponnambalam
7. N.Ganapathi
8. G.Indirani
9. S.P.Sankaravadivu
10. P.Kannammal
11. V.Aruljothi
12. J.Savariammal
13. S.Ponnammal
14. T.Arulraj
15. R.Devendran
16. S.Govindaraju
17. P.Kandasamy
18. T.Padma
19. S.Palanisundaram
20. R.Radhakrishnan
21. V.Ramasamy
22. M.Ramalingam
23. T.S.Rajendran
24. P.V.Subramanian
25. B.Venkatraman
26. V.Yagnaraman
27. R.Lalitha
28. J.Rani
29. P.Janaki
30. S.Suseela
31. P.Muthulakshmi
32. R.Narayanan
33. K.Veerayee
34. S.Palvannam
35. K.Narayanan
36. G.Venkatraman
37. K.Venkatesan
38. G.Rosappuvammal
39. B.Seethalakshmi
40. A.Janaki
41. C.Leelavathy
42. D.Chellasamy
43. R.Sarojini
44. J.Vijayalatha
45. R.Seelaswamy alias John Sellaswamy
46. S.Annathai
47. M.Arulmani
48. S.Selvyn Muthiah
49. K.Sulochana
50. I.Thandavarayan
51. V.Thiyagarajan .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by The Secretary to Government, Finance Pension Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
.. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to extend the benefit of adding the entire D.A. actually drawn by the employees retired during the period of 10 months preceeding to the retirement for reckoning average emoluments and for computing pension, to the petitioners retired in between 1.1.88 to 31.12.95 since the benefit had already been extended to those retired upto 31.12.87 consequent on the judgment dated 6.5.96 in O.A.4953/92 by T.A.T. which was implemented by government in G.O.Ms.No.272 and 273 fin. (Pen.) Dept. dated 15.06.1998 read with G.O.449 fin. (pension) Department dated 12.10.99 and Government letter No.95284(PC) 2000-01 dated 3.5.2001 to all the petitioners retired from 1.1.88 to 31.12.1995 with all consequential pensionary benefits with arrears.
For Petitioners :
Mr.R.Premnarayan For Respondent :
Mr.K.Ravikumar Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.
2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar
AT To The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Finance Pension Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 50392.
W.P.No.25424 of 2007 SV(CO) SP(11/08/2018)