← Library
Madras High CourtArb O.P(COM.DIV.)/295/2021withdrawn dismissed

Keerthy Travels, Now A Partnership Firm, Rep. By Its Managing Partner Mr. V.Krishnan v. Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd

2023-07-11Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.07.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Keerthy Travels Now a Partnership Firm, Represented by its Managing Partnership, Mr.V.Krishnan, Hotel Hilux Buildings, No.15/722, Keerthy Kunnathur Medu, Palakkad - 678 013, Kerala State.

... Petitioner vs.

1.Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., No.1, Ranganathan Gardens, Off 11th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai - 600 040.

2.The Managing Director, Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Bharath Bhavan, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400 001.

3.The Director (Marketing), Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Bharath Bhavan, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400 001.

...Respondents

1/4

Prayer: Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) filed under Section 11(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint arbitrator to decide the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mrs.R.Jayasudha Suryanarayanan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramasubramaniam for M/s.Ramasubramaniam Associates

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that aggrieved by the order passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the respondent in the said Section 34 application has preferred Original Side appeals, which are still pending on the file of a Division Bench of this Court. Therefore, she has made an endorsement in the Court bundle withdrawing this Section 11 application, but, however, seeks liberty of this Court to file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 depending upon the outcome of the Original Side Appeals.

2. The said endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is recorded. In terms of the said endorsement, this petition is 2/4

disposed of, by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator depending upon the outcome of the Original Side Appeals filed by the respondent in the Section 34 application. 11.07.2023 ms Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order 3/4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

ms 11.07.2023 4/4