Hariharan, v. The State Represented By, Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Hariharan .. Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police Tiruppur Central Police Station Tiruppur District Crime No.256 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No. 256 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Nandhakumar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.05.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 and Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in connection with Crime No.256 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. 1/6

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as processing manager at Arasan Dying Processing Mill and the petitioner is working as Dying machine operator on contract basis in the same mill. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence,the petitioner along with other accused, under the influence of alcohol, tried to assault the defacto complainant and also damaged company properties including a two wheeler with wooden rod. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence, however, he is suffering incarceration from 26.05.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are totally seven accused in this case and the 2/6

petitioner was arrested on 26.05.2025. He also submitted that all the accused persons were employed by the defacto complainant, thereafter they were removed from the job since they were not working properly. Due to which, the petitioner along with others damaged the company properties worth Rs.3 lakhs.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruppur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one 3/6

of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) to the credit of crime number and produce the Bank Challan before the learned Magistrate concerned at the time of executing the sureties.

[d] The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [f] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard;

[g] On breach of any of the aforementioned 4/6

conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 27.06.2025 nr Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

nr 5/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruppur,

2. The Inspector of Police Tiruppur Central Police Station Tiruppur District

3. The Superintendent, Central prison, Coimbatore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

27.06.2025 6/6