Madras High CourtWP/42554/2006settled before the lokadalats

M/S. Selva Ganapathy Rice v. The Chairman,

2015-04-23Honourable Mr Justice P.Thangavel(Lok-I)4 pages

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Thursday, the 23th day of April 2015 LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P.THANGAVEL (Retd.) and Members Mr.S.Manoharan, District Judge, (Retd) Mrs.V.Nalini W.P.No.42554 of 2006 (This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ or in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2006 M/s Selva Ganapathy Rice Mill, Rep by its Managing Partner, S.Kolandaisamy, .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, 2.The General Manager, 3.The Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office, Coimbatore - 18.

4.The Assistant General Manager, Coimbatore.

.. Respondents

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.P.D.Audikesavalu, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 is present.

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT The writ petition in W.P.No.42554 of 2006 pending on the file of the High Court, Madras has been referred to the Lok Adalat for conciliation today.

2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus or direction in the nature of a writ, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2006 and pass such further or other orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

3. The petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4 filed a joint memo to the effect that the representation of the petitioner has been considered by the respondents and a sum of Rs.26,17,000/- was received by the respondents from the petitioner on 16.11.2007. It is also stated in the memo that the respondent has also closed the accounts of the petitioner on receipt of the above said amount and documents received for creating equitable mortgage has also been returned by the authority concerned to the petitioner on 09.11.2009. The said Joint Memo has been recorded by the Lok Adalat.

4. In view of the compromise arrived at between both parties before the Lok Adalat and in view of the recording to the above said Memo containing the details of payment by the petitioner to the respondents, it is ordered that there is no amount due to the respondents from the petitioner. Award is passed to the effect that nothing survive in this writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. The aforesaid memo shall form part of the award. No order as to costs. Signature of the counsel for petitioner is not necessary since the said counsel has already signed along with petitioner in the Memo filed and recorded.

Sd/-

1. The Chairman,

2. The General Manager,

3. The Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office, Coimbatore - 18.

4. The Assistant General Manager, Coimbatore. Sd/- Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4 This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the petitioner in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

*The Xerox Copy of Memo is enclosed herewith.

Sd/- Judge Sd/- Sd/- Member Member Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to

1. The Chairman,

2. The General Manager,

3. The Deputy General Manager, Zone Office, Coimbatore - 18.

4. The Assistant General Manager, Coimbatore.

5. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

6. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

7. The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies.

W.P.No.42554 of 2006 ug(CO) srg(20/05/2016)