← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22218/2023dismissed

Rajalakshmi v. Bureau Of Immigration

2024-04-12Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam5 pages

2024:MHC:1931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.04.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and W.M.P.No.21602 of 2023 Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Represented by its Commissioner (Immigration), Shastri Bhawan, Annexe Building, 26, Haddows Road, Nungabakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

2.Foreign Regional Registration Officer (FRRO) Chennai, No.26, Shastri Bhawan Annexe Building, 26, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

3.Indian Bank, Stressed Assets Management Branch, Zonal Office Building, 2nd Floor, 55, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, direction of like nature that the action of the respondents in issuing Look Out Circular against the Petitioner and not permitting the petitioner to travel abroad is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair and without authority of law and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Bharath For R1 & R2 : Mrs.R.Durgarani Central Govt. Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.T.Sundar Rajan

O R D E R

The Writ of Declaration has been instituted to declare the look out circular issued by the 3rd respondent / Indian Bank is in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. It is not in dispute between the parties that the petitioner borrowed loan from the 3rd respondent / Indian Bank and the due as on today is approximately Rs.1,87,78,538/- Crores.

3. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent / Bank would submit that

in the event of allowing the petitioner to travel abroad, the Bank may not be in a position to recover the dues. The petitioner was the Director of the Company and her sister was also a Director and a Guarantor. Therefore, she is accountable in respect of the loan dues to be paid to the 3rd respondent.

4. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the 3rd respondent / Bank filed a complaint and the Criminal Case has been registered by the Central Crime Branch, Veppery, Chennai in Crime No.29 of 2022 under Sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) read with 34 Indian Penal Code (I.P.C). When a Criminal Case has been registered by the Central Crime Branch, the petitioner has to approach the jurisdictional Criminal Court for the purpose of defending her case or to seek further relief in the manner known to law.

5. With these observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 12.04.2024 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order

To 1.The Commissioner (Immigration), Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, Annexe Building, 26, Haddows Road, Nungabakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

2.The Foreign Regional Registration Officer (FRRO) Chennai, No.26, Shastri Bhawan Annexe Building, 26, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

3.Indian Bank, Stressed Assets Management Branch, Zonal Office Building, 2nd Floor, 55, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Jeni 12.04.2024