S.Amuda Ganesan v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20144 of 2021 1 S.AMUDA GANESAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SELVARAJ ARUN KUMAR Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-7, CHETPET POLICE STATION, CHETPET, CHENNAI 600 031.
(CRIME NO.276 OF 2021) For Petitioner : M/S.KAVITHA DEENADAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail for the alleged offences under Section 294(b), 323 IPC & 4 of the T.N. Prohibition of Harassment of Women, 2002 in Crime No.276 of 2021. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the offence mentioned in the FIR is only bailable offence. Hence, granting anticipatory bail doesn't arise.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The above submission made by the learned Government Advocate is recorded and liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with law before the concerned Jurisdiction Court. Accordingly, this petition seeking anticipatory bail is disposed of.
-sd/- 28/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-7, CHETPET POLICE STATION, CHETPET, CHENNAI 600 031.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/S.KAVITHA DEENADAYALAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12092 CRL OP.20144/2021 Date :28/10/2021 CSK 16/11/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/