G.Mithun Chakravarthi v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.07.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.17894 of 2024 G.Mithun Chakravarthi ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by.

The Inspector of Police B6 Mappedu Police Station, Pallikaranai District.

Crime No. 228 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with FIR in Crime No. 228 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Bala Subramaniam For Respondent : Mr.V.Meganathan, B.A., B.L., Government Advocate (Crl. side) 1/5

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.07.2024 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 309(6), 311, 351(3) of BNSS in crime No. 228 of 2024 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons entered into the defacto complainant's shop at 09.30 a.m on 09.07.2024 and kept a knife on the defacto complainant's neck and taken Rs.500 from his pocket and run away from the place. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and co- accused has been released on bail. Hence, he prays to allow this petition.

4. On the other side, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that there are three previous cases pending against the petitioner. However, he raised objection to grant bail.

2/5

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that A1 has been released on bail and also the investigation is almost completed. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ( one must be a blood surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Tiruvallur, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

3/5

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

29.07.2024 pbl 4/5

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

pbl To

1. The Judicial Magistrate - II, Tiruvallur.

2. The Inspector of Police B6 Mappedu Police Station, Pallikaranai District.

3. The Central Prison - II, Puzhal, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.17894 of 2024 29.07.2024 5/5