R.Manimaran, M/28 v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 07.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.19116 of 2018 R.Manimaran .. Petitioner Vs 1.State rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mahabalipuram Range, Mahabalipuram, Kancheepuram District.

2.Sathya .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner for notice was issued by the 1st respondent on the basis of the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent which was taken on file by the 1st respondent as C.No.113/SPKPM/SDO/MPM/2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar For 1st Respondent : Mr.C.Raghavan, GA

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1st respondent. 3.Learned Government Advocate submitted that on the complaint given by one Sathya against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in C.No.113/SP-KPM/SDO/MPM/2018 before the 1st respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting enquiry, the petitioner shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Audit) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mahabalipuram Range, Mahabalipuram, Kancheepuram District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.19116 of 2018 VSNII(CO) GSP(21/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/