M.K. Moorthy v. The Presiding Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.04.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.42574 of 2006 M.K.Moorthy

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai.

2.The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Raheja Complex, Anna Salai, Chennai.

...Respondents

Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Directions and in particular in writ in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus, after calling for the records from the 1st respondent relating to the preliminary order dated 22.09.2005 and the award dated 05.04.2006 in I.D.No.427 of 2004 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent bank to reinstate the petitioner in service with effect from 24.04.2003 the date of discharge, pay full back wages after adjusting the amount paid on account of discharge, with continuity of service, consequential and other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.Anand for T.S.Gopalan & Co., For R2

O R D E R

When the above writ petition was posted for hearing on 26.04.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today "for dismissal". https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dh To 1.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.T.S.Gopalan, Advocate SR.No.32078 W.P.No.42574 of 2006 KS(CO) GN(05/06/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/