P.Subramanian v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN P.Subramanian

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Collector, Salem.

2. The Block Development Officer (VP), Mecheri Block,

3. The Panchayat President, Bukkampatty Panchayat,

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to reinstate the petitioner into the service pursuant to the order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1060/2021/T2 dated 10.07.2023.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Aneesh Vinayak For Respondents : Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam, Additional Government Pleader 1/4

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the relief sought in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and has made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.

2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

03.02.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order kv To

1. The District Collector, Salem.

2. The Block Development Officer (VP), Mecheri Block,

3. The Panchayat President, 2/4

Bukkampatty Panchayat, 3/4

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J.

kv 03.02.2025 4/4