Nandini F/A 26 Years v. The State By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.01.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN H.C.P.No. 2697 of 2016 Mrs.Nandini ..

Petitioner Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Superintendent of Police District Police Office Krishnagiri District

2. The Inspector of Police City Crime Branch District Police Office Krishnagiri District .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing respondents to produce the detenu one Murugan, male, aged 30 years and set him at liberty.2 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Raja Mohamed For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1& R2

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.] Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, had submitted that the detenu had come back home and he is living with the petitioner, at present. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. As such, there is no cause of action existing, at present, for maintaining the present Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gpa To 1.The Superintendent of Police District Police Office Krishnagiri District

2. The Inspector of Police City Crime Branch District Police Office Krishnagiri District 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to M/s. A. Raja Mohamed, Advocate Sr.3151 H.C.P.No.2697 of 2016 GMI(CO) Eu 02.2.17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/