N.Sudaliammal, v. The Tahsildhar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.10.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.16839 of 2010 N.Sudaliammal

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Tasildhar Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai - 600 078.

2. Kumar.

...Respondents

Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to release the patta in favour of the petitioner after name transfer in terms of the petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2010.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents: Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi Additional Government Pleader for R1.

*******

ORDER

When the writ petition came up for hearing on 17.10.2016, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be posted under the caption "For dismissal". Even today, when the matter was called, no one is representing for the petitioner.

2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rts https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Tasildhar Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai - 600 078.

+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 59641 W.P.No.16839 of 2010 aa14/11/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/