K.Shyam Kumar v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 30.12.2020 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN CRL.O.P.No.20892 of 2020 K.Shyam Kumar .. Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by Inspector of Police, G-3, Kilapauk Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai.

(Crime No. Not Known) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner an anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. Not Known of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Ms.B.Rama For Respondent : Mr.T.Shanmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ***

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No. Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that there is no petition or enquiry is pending as against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 30/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE NO.II, EGMORE, CHENNAI.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-3, KILPAUK POLICE STATION, KILPAUK, CHENNAI.

+1 CC to M/S. D.S.RAMESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.8769 CRL OP.20892/2020 Date :30/12/2020 cs 06/01/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/